Friday, December 7, 2018

Congress Gets Involved In Beef Recall

Amid the beef recall hitting the United States, one cannot help but think about the post I wrote recently regarding the unkown fact that bacteria is not checked in meat/poultry products after the products leave the warehouse by the Food Safety Inspection Service. As I alluded to, corporations left on their own to conduct inspections is a path toward outbreaks. Not all corporations are offenders. Although, the beef recall is indicative the lack of inspections on part of a corporation --

Congress has now been inserted into the recall based on the number of people affected by the tainted (salmonella tainted) beef. Congresswomen Rosa DeLauro sent a letter of inquiry to Agricultural Secretary Sonny Purdue shown below:

Source: Congress

The following message is written on the letter shown above:

Dear Secretary Purdue:

I write today to request additional information regarding the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) oversight of operation at the JBS Tolleson, Inc. beef packing plant.

Earlier today, USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) announced the company has expanded its Class 1 Recall of ground beef that may be contaminated with Salmonella Newport. This outbreak, which now includes a recall of more than 12 million pounds of ground beef, has sickened 246 people across 25 states and has resulted in 59 hospitalizations.

To better understand the failures that have led to this outbreak, I am requesting complete Salmonella testing results from the plant in question during the 52 weeks prior to this outbreak. This request is consistent with FSIS Directive 1400.1.

Thank you for your attention, and I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

Rosa L. DeLauro
Member of Congress

I am glad to see that congress has now been involved in the matter. Especially since the inquiry comes against the backdrop of a recently released report by the Food Safety Inspection Service on the efficacy of poultry inspections in a variety of poultry plants around the United States. The report shows that a sizable portion of the poultry plants have earned less than stellar (alarming) grades on their ability to inspect for Salmonella (along with other bacteria) in the outgoing products.

Conclusion...

The issue is a moving target -- an ongoing situation -- which is changing and will be updated on this site when news pops up. Food safety from a contamination standpoint is just as alarming as food safety from ingredient safety is to me. Each of us deserve to understand the regulations and checks (and balances) which exist in government (federal down through local) to provide a safety and healthy product to the consumer.

Stay vigilant and educate yourself on the safety of the world around yourself. Education is the best weapon to combat any problem which plagues society. Unfortunately, not enough education is accomplished on this matter at professional institutions. Therefore, the responsibility lies within each of us to do the work. Stay tuned.

Related Blog Posts:

One Unknown Fact Which Should Cause Consumers To Be Careful About Handling Meat Before Cooking!

How Effective Are Poultry Corporations At Reducing Salmonella In Their Products?

Ralph Nader: Post Election -- Next Step -- Open Up The Existing Secretive Congress

New trend in the Thanksgiving Holiday for 2018? Smaller Turkeys?

A Forecaster Predicts That Hurricane Florence Will Drop Enough Rain To Fill 18,400 Mercedes-Benz Superdomes

Hurricane Harvey Drops Enough Rain On Houston To Fill 560 Dallas Cowboy Stadiums

How Much Water Is Contained In All Oceans Around The Globe?

Storm Raises Water Level In Lake Cachuma By 31 feet, How Much Water Is That?

How To Make Sense Of Water Flowing At 100,000 Cubic Feet Per Second

Can 11 Trillion Gallons Of Water Fill 14,000 Dallas Cowboys Stadiums?

How Much Rain Did The East Coast Receive From Hurricane Matthew?

How Much Rain Did Haiti Really Receive?

How Much Rainfall Has Dropped On Louisiana?

How Big Was The "Water Bomb" Of Rainfall In Macedonia?

How Much Rain Did Huauchinango (Mexico) receive?

How Much Rain Did Elliot City (Maryland) Really Receive?

If The Mosul Dam Breaks, The City Of Mosul Would Be Under 65 Feet Of Water?

What is the volume of water in a few inches of rain?

Volume of Waste in the Mine Spill (in Brazil) Equivalent to 78 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spills

Thursday, October 11, 2018

How many cows are needed to generate 50,000 tons of beef exports?

Source: EcoWarriorPrincess

Recently, I wrote a post on the import of butter into the United States in a given month. According to the excerpt that I cited, the amount in a single month was significant (as an import). Continuing along this path, the media/news outlet 'Politico' recently reported about the negotiations surrounding the export of beef to Europe. As indicated in the excerpt below, European nations want to cap the amount of 'hormone-free' beef arriving from outside nations:

How the quota works: The policy stems from a long-running World Trade Organization dispute over the EU's refusal to import U.S. beef treated with hormones. In 2009, the U.S. and EU agreed to set an annual quota of 45,000 metric tonnes (nearly 50,000 in U.S. tons) for hormone-free-beef imports to Europe, which was open to the U.S. and other nations.

After reading the ceiling of 50,000 tons for the import limit from outside nations, I wondered how many cows are needed to generate that amount of beef. Below is the analysis with the answer.

How much beef for a single cow?

To begin the analysis, the first question is searchable by using a search engine such as Google with the following question: How much usable meat from a cow? The answer is shown below:

Source: Google

Note: At first sight, the way that the question is stated might seem strange. Although, as a user enters words, the Google algorithm starts to guess what the final question is. Which I use to assemble the question. That statement was put into the blog post to cover the readers who will read the question and wonder if I know how to ask questions. Yes, the answer is in short. I am not beyond the use of assembled questions though too.

The answer indicates that from a 750 pound carcass (remains of a single cow), there will be roughly 490 pounds of 'steak'. This answer is the conversion factor which we will use to convert the total amount of meat (hormone-free beef) into cows. The conversion factor is shown below:

The total amount of usage (edible) amount of beef from a single cow is shown above to be 490 pounds of meat. Before that conversion factor can be useful in our analysis, another unit conversion must take place. The statistic cited in the introduction of 50,000 tons is expressed in units of 'ton'. In order to divide by the number above, a unit conversion needs to be accomplished from units of 'ton' to units of 'pound' as shown below:

Our unit conversion revealed that 50,000 tons of beef corresponds to 100 million pounds of beef. How many cattle does that represent? The question of interest can be answered by dividing the answer above by 490 pounds/cow as shown below:

100 million pounds of beef -- the total amount of 'hormone-free' beef allowed to be imported into Europe from outside nations requires 204,082 cows to be processed for beef!

How do 204,082 cattle as exports compare to the total amount of cattle processed for beef annually in the United States?

A quick search using Google will reveal a few answers. One of which is from a website called "Beef2Live" with the following annual world beef production statistics shown below:

Source: Beef2Live.com

I restricted the image size only to include the top 5 beef producers in the world. As you can see, the United States is the largest. The annual production of beef in the United States is around 12 million tons of beef. In comparison, 50,000 tons represents around 0.41% of Annual Beef production in the United States.

Conclusion

Wow! That really shows the restriction of imported beef into nations under the European Union from outside nations. At first sight the number might seem significant. Although, after performing an analysis and casting the statistic into perspective of annual beef production in the United States, the statistic is rather small. Further, the United States is the world's largest beef producer on an annual basis. Analyses like the one above really help a reader understand the news in relation to other reported values. The cited statistic is not really that significant as reported in the excerpt above. Although, with the status of today's global trade negotiations, every cow counts.

Related Blog Posts:

Parameters: How many sticks of butter are contained in 7.5 million pounds of butter?

South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster asks lawmakers for $1,228,000,000 For Recovery from Hurricane Florence?

Boston Natural Gas Explosion Reveals Old Piping Needs Replacement - Enough To Travel To Colorado?